| Complaint: | Complaint 18-71 |
|---|---|
| Respondent: | Wesley Arnold |
| Premises: | AZPetVet Sarival Animal Hospital |
| Related: | 18-70 |
The complainant restates the same complaint from 18-70 but regarding Arnold, one of the other veterinarians, rather than Hindley. The complainant had spoken with Arnold on the phone repeatedly as well as during a recheck examination.
Arnold's response states that during the exam he did not detect any lung pathology and recommended medication for vomiting, nausea, and pain. He mentions that he told the complainant to bring the dog back or take the dog to a 24-hour animal hospital if the dog's condition required it. He also states that he informed the complainant about the potential for skin necrosis because of the severity of the dog attack. He also states that when he learned of some of the dog's later issues by phone he recomended she bring the dog in sooner than scheduled.
It appears the Investigative Committee discussion here was pasted directly from the summary on 18-70. It talks about Hindley several times but never mentions Arnold once.
| Source: | May 5, 2018 PM Investigative Committee Meeting |
|---|---|
| People: | |
| David Stoll | Respondent Attorney |
| Wesley Arnold | Respondent |
| Roll Call: | |
| Adam Almaraz | Aye |
| Amrit Rai | Aye |
| Christine Butkiewicz | Absent |
| Donald Noah | Aye |
| Tamara Murphy | Aye |
| Result: | Passed |
| Source: | June 6, 2018 Board Meeting |
|---|---|
| People: | |
| David Stoll | Respondent Attorney |
| Proposed By: | Nikki Frost |
| Seconded By: | Jessica Creager |
| Roll Call: | |
| Christina Bertch-Mumaw | Absent |
| Darren Wright | Aye |
| J Greg Byrne | Absent |
| Jessica Creager | Aye |
| Jim Loughead | Aye |
| Julie Young | Aye |
| Nikki Frost | Aye |
| Robyn Jaynes | Aye |
| Sarah Heinrich | Aye |
| Result: | Passed |
The primary source for the above summary was obtained as a public record from the Arizona State Veterinary Medical Examining Board. You are welcome to review the original records and board meeting minutes by clicking the relevant links. While we endeavor to provide an accurate summary of the complaint, response, investigative reports and board actions, we encourage you to review the primary sources and come to your own conclusions. In some cases we have also been able to reach out to individuals with knowledge of specific complaints, and where possible that information will be included here.