Complaint: | Complaint 18-66 |
---|---|
Respondent: | Tracey Scott |
Premises: | Pima Pet Clinic |
Related: | 18-65, 18-67 |
The complainant states that the clinic in 18-65 informed her that the x-ray she was given wasn't actually of the correct cat. She also complains that after seeing her cat two times they refused to see her when she had an eye condition that Wiseman said was an upper respiratory infection. She also complains about a nonconclusive x-ray and ordering a urine culture.
Scott's response gives us summaries of the cat's visits to the hospital. She also notes similar concerns about the complainant as Trueba in 18-65, but unlike him, she doesn't chalk it up to old age or diagnose a mental illness. She does mention a tumor and that she was concerned for a malignancy, but that the complainant was certain that it was a lipoma. She also states that the facility denied care on subsequent occasions because of the complainant's behavior to the staff, stating that the complainant had been notified of that previously.
The Investigative Committee discussion is pasted in from 18-65.
Source: | May 5, 2018 PM Investigative Committee Meeting |
---|---|
People: | |
Tracey Scott | Respondent |
Roll Call: | |
Adam Almaraz | Aye |
Amrit Rai | Aye |
Christine Butkiewicz | Absent |
Donald Noah | Aye |
Tamara Murphy | Aye |
Result: | Passed |
Source: | June 6, 2018 Board Meeting |
---|---|
People: | |
David Stoll | Respondent Attorney |
Proposed By: | Darren Wright |
Seconded By: | Jessica Creager |
Roll Call: | |
Christina Bertch-Mumaw | Absent |
Darren Wright | Aye |
J Greg Byrne | Absent |
Jessica Creager | Aye |
Jim Loughead | Aye |
Julie Young | Aye |
Nikki Frost | Aye |
Robyn Jaynes | Aye |
Sarah Heinrich | Aye |
Result: | Passed |
The primary source for the above summary was obtained as a public record from the Arizona State Veterinary Medical Examining Board. You are welcome to review the original records and board meeting minutes by clicking the relevant links. While we endeavor to provide an accurate summary of the complaint, response, investigative reports and board actions, we encourage you to review the primary sources and come to your own conclusions. In some cases we have also been able to reach out to individuals with knowledge of specific complaints, and where possible that information will be included here.