A dog's pyometra surgery results in complications and a complainant fears a conspiracy: Part III

Complaint: Complaint 18-111
Respondent: Carly Blom
Premises: VetMed
Related: 18-109, 18-110, 18-112, 18-113

The complainant makes accusations of a large cover-up at VetMed and another clinic. After the surgery the dog developed complications that required a second surgery. She believes the complications were caused by problems that occurred during the surgery. The complainant repeats concerns regarding a cropped or modified photograph, incorrect surgical procedures. She also mentions her concerns about incorrect medical records (apparently stating blood work was normal when it wasn't) and forged signatures on the discharge instructions.

Blom states that the images that were sent were not tampered with by her but does note that they appear to have been "compressed in size and scope." She also states that the dog's weight was recorded twice, once at 27.0 kg and another at 26.6 kg, and goes on to use that weight in calculating the dosage of antibiotics given to the dog. She also notes that there were some abnormalities (specifically sodium and potassium). She discusses that the signature the complainant references occurred on a touchscreen pad rather than on paper and compares to other of the complainant's signatures. She also pastes their notes about conversations with the complainant, including one that claims the complainant was angry the spleen was not removed and that "we'll see what happens" when the test comes back for hemangiosarcoma.

The Investigative Committee copies verbatim from 18-109.

Motions

Investigative Motion: Dismiss with no violation

Source: September 9, 2018 PM Investigative Committee Meeting
People:
Carly Blom Respondent
W Reed Campbell Respondent Attorney
Roll Call:
Adam Almaraz Aye
Amrit Rai Aye
Christine Butkiewicz Aye
Donald Noah Aye
William Hamilton Aye
Result: Passed

Board Motion: Dismiss with no violation

Source: October 10, 2018 Board Meeting
People:
David Stoll Respondent Attorney
Proposed By: Darren Wright
Seconded By: Sarah Heinrich
Roll Call:
Christina Bertch-Mumaw Recused
Darren Wright Aye
J Greg Byrne Absent
Jessica Creager Absent
Jim Loughead Aye
Julie Young Aye
Nikki Frost Aye
Robyn Jaynes Recused
Sarah Heinrich Aye
Result: Passed

The primary source for the above summary was obtained as a public record from the Arizona State Veterinary Medical Examining Board. You are welcome to review the original records and board meeting minutes by clicking the relevant links. While we endeavor to provide an accurate summary of the complaint, response, investigative reports and board actions, we encourage you to review the primary sources and come to your own conclusions. In some cases we have also been able to reach out to individuals with knowledge of specific complaints, and where possible that information will be included here.