A dog's pyometra surgery results in complications and a complainant fears a conspiracy: Part IV

Complaint: Complaint 18-112
Respondent: T Arch Robinson
Premises: VetMed
Related: 18-109, 18-110, 18-111, 18-113

The complainant makes accusations of a large cover-up at VetMed and another clinic. Detail is provided regarding various claims on the other complaints in this series. Robertson is VetMed's responsible veterinarian and the respondent in this particular complaint.

Robertson states that he's the responsible veterinarian for the premises. He also states that while he did not have any contact with the dog, he's confident in the care provided at his hospital.

The Investigative Committee copies verbatim from 18-109.

Motions

Investigative Motion: Dismiss with no violation

Source: September 9, 2018 PM Investigative Committee Meeting
People:
T Arch Robinson Respondent
Roll Call:
Adam Almaraz Aye
Amrit Rai Aye
Christine Butkiewicz Aye
Donald Noah Aye
William Hamilton Aye
Result: Passed

Board Motion: Dismiss with no violation

Source: October 10, 2018 Board Meeting
Proposed By: Darren Wright
Seconded By: Sarah Heinrich
Roll Call:
Christina Bertch-Mumaw Recused
Darren Wright Aye
J Greg Byrne Absent
Jessica Creager Absent
Jim Loughead Aye
Julie Young Aye
Nikki Frost Aye
Robyn Jaynes Recused
Sarah Heinrich Aye
Result: Passed

The primary source for the above summary was obtained as a public record from the Arizona State Veterinary Medical Examining Board. You are welcome to review the original records and board meeting minutes by clicking the relevant links. While we endeavor to provide an accurate summary of the complaint, response, investigative reports and board actions, we encourage you to review the primary sources and come to your own conclusions. In some cases we have also been able to reach out to individuals with knowledge of specific complaints, and where possible that information will be included here.